CFTC v. Defendant Eric Moncada (price manipulation, 2014)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2014, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Defendant Eric Moncada, alleging conduct this library classifies as price manipulation and wash trading. The release records a civil penalty of $1.6 million.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 7026-14 |
| Date filed | 2014-10-02 |
| Date resolved | 2014-10-02 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | futures |
| Venue | CBOT |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Defendant Eric Moncada |
| Techniques | Price manipulation , Wash trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $1.6m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $1.6m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on October 2, 2014 as release 7026-14. The respondents named are Defendant Eric Moncada (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
This library tags the matter as price manipulation and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against futures, with CBOT identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $1.6 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Wash trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2014-10-02 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. unnamed respondents (cash vs derivatives schemes, 2022) | CFTC | 2022-10-20 | Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes , Exchange Wash Trading +4 | $41m | judgment |
| CFTC v. Navinder Sarao (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-11-07 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Ponzi Schemes +3 | $1.6m | judgment |
| CFTC v. RP Martin Holdings Limited and Its Subsidiary (benchmark submission rigging, 2014) | CFTC | 2014-05-16 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation +1 | $1.2m | judgment |
| CFTC v. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc and RBS Securities Japan Limited (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | CFTC | 2013-02-07 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation +1 | $325m | judgment |
| SEC v. Gotbit Consulting LLC a/k/a Gotbit Hedge Fund and Fedor Kedrov (wash trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-03 | Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. George Santos (price manipulation, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-31 | Price Manipulation | $35k | judgment |