CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Gabriel Perez, alleging conduct this library classifies as insider trading. The release records a civil penalty of $65,000.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 9289-26 |
| Date filed | 2026-08-28 |
| Date resolved | 2026-08-28 |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | trading ban |
| Defendants | Gabriel Perez |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $65k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $65k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on August 28, 2026 as release 9289-26. The respondents named are Gabriel Perez (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $65,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: trading ban.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2026-08-28 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | unknown |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Jamal (“Jimmy”) Chammout and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-17 | Insider Trading | $497k | judgment |
| SEC v. Robert Yedid, Andrew Kaufman, and Mark Jacobs (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-10 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |