Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Aequitas Management, LLC, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2020)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Aequitas Management, LLC, et al., alleging conduct this library classifies as ponzi schemes. The release records a civil penalty of $625,000, disgorgement of $453 million.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24805
Date filed 2020-04-24
Date resolved 2020-04-24
Court U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
Status judgment
Asset class bonds
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed conduct-based injunction, registration bar
Defendants Aequitas Management, LLC, et al. (entity)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$625k
Disgorgement
$453m
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$454m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 24, 2020 as release LR-24805. The respondents named are Aequitas Management, LLC, et al. (0 individuals, 1 entity). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, District of Oregon.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against bonds.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $625,000, disgorgement of $453 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction, registration bar.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2020-04-24 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan a/k/a Nam Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes settled
SEC v. David T. Gilchrist, Christopher Aaron Novinger, Rebecca Novinger (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-01 Ponzi Schemes unknown
SEC v. Mordechai Haim Ferder and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-01 Ponzi Schemes unknown
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures Inc. and CEO (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes settled

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.