SEC v. Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (pump and dump, 2020)
Status unknown
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq., alleging conduct this library classifies as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and undisclosed control blocks. The release records disgorgement of $1,800.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-19668 |
| Date filed | 2020-01-23 |
| Status | unknown |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | OTC |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. |
| Techniques | Pump and dump , Reverse merger schemes , Undisclosed control blocks |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $1.8k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $1.8k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on January 23, 2020 as release 3-19668. The respondents named are Benjamin L. Bunker, Esq. (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as pump and dump, reverse merger schemes and undisclosed control blocks, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities, with OTC identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $1,800. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Reverse merger schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Undisclosed control blocks — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Joe Yiu Cheung ( and Dylon De Lu Zhang) (paid stock promotion, 2017) | SEC | 2017-08-02 | Paid Stock Promotion , Pump And Dump +2 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-02-07 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | judgment |
| SEC v. DiScala et al., (pump and dump, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-20 | Pump And Dump , Reverse Merger Schemes | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Domenic Calabrigo et al. (pump and dump, 2022) | SEC | 2022-04-19 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | filed |
| SEC v. Ulrik Debo (custodianship shell hijacking, 2020) | SEC | 2020-01-03 | Custodianship Shell Hijacking , Pump And Dump +1 | — | filed |
| SEC v. John Madsen, Andalusian Resorts and others (fake press releases, 2018) | SEC | 2018-10-23 | Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump +1 | — | judgment |