Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. NanoBit Limited, et al. (chat group pumps, 2026)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against NanoBit Limited, et al., alleging conduct this library classifies as chat group pumps. The release records a civil penalty of $1.2 million, disgorgement of $532,649, prejudgment interest of $81,957.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-26576
Date filed 2026-06-29
Date resolved 2026-06-29
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Status judgment
Criminal parallel No
Defendants NanoBit Limited, et al. (entity)
Techniques Chat group pumps

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$1.2m
Disgorgement
$533k
Prejudgment interest
$82k
Total relief
$1.8m
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on June 29, 2026 as release LR-26576. The respondents named are NanoBit Limited, et al. (0 individuals, 1 entity). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York.

This library tags the matter as chat group pumps, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $1.2 million, disgorgement of $532,649, prejudgment interest of $81,957. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2026-06-29 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. NanoBit Limited, Radiant Horizons Limited, Sweet Karma Fashion Inc., Zhao Tropical Deli Inc., Jiajie Liu, Fei Liao, and Hua Zhao (chat group pumps, 2024) SEC 2024-09-17 Chat Group Pumps filed
SEC v. Flyfish Club, LLC (chat group pumps, 2024) SEC 2024-09-16 Chat Group Pumps , Unregistered Distributions $750k settled
SEC v. BarnBridge DAO (chat group pumps, 2023) SEC 2023-12-22 Chat Group Pumps settled
SEC v. Tyler Ward and Troy Murray (chat group pumps, 2023) SEC 2023-12-22 Chat Group Pumps settled
SEC v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (chat group pumps, 2021) SEC 2021-12-17 Chat Group Pumps filed

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.