Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Randy A. Hamdan and Oracle Consultants, LLC (fake press releases, 2016)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Randy A. Hamdan and Oracle Consultants, LLC, alleging conduct this library classifies as fake press releases and pump and dump. The release records a civil penalty of $150,000, disgorgement of $29,216, prejudgment interest of $5,965.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23470
Date filed 2016-02-17
Date resolved 2016-02-17
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
Status judgment
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Randy A. Hamdan (individual) ; Oracle Consultants, LLC (entity)
Techniques Fake press releases , Pump and dump

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$150k
Disgorgement
$29.2k
Prejudgment interest
$6k
Total relief
$185k
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on February 17, 2016 as release LR-23470. The respondents named are Randy A. Hamdan and Oracle Consultants, LLC (1 individual, 1 entity). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.

This library tags the matter as fake press releases and pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $150,000, disgorgement of $29,216, prejudgment interest of $5,965. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-02-17 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark A. Miller (fake press releases, 2021) SEC 2021-06-21 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump unknown
SEC v. Mark E. Fisher, Esq. (fake press releases, 2018) SEC 2018-11-02 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump judgment
SEC v. John Madsen, Andalusian Resorts and others (fake press releases, 2018) SEC 2018-10-23 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump +1 judgment
SEC v. Andalusian Resorts and others (fake press releases, 2017) SEC 2017-10-30 Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion +2 filed
SEC v. Martin T. Cantu (fake press releases, 2017) SEC 2017-10-02 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump unknown
SEC v. Michael J. Forster (pump and dump, 2026) SEC 2026-07-15 Pump And Dump judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.