Market Manipulation. Search

This action was dismissed. The allegations described below were not established. This page is kept online so that the outcome is visible alongside the original filing.

SEC v. Sergei Polevikov, et al. (front running, 2022)

Dismissed

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action, since dismissed, against Sergei Polevikov, et al., alleging conduct this library classifies as front running. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-25475
Date filed 2022-08-17
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status dismissed
Criminal parallel Yes
Defendants Sergei Polevikov, et al. (individual)
Techniques Front running

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
Alleged gain
$8.5m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 17, 2022 as release LR-25475. The respondents named are Sergei Polevikov, et al. (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

This library tags the matter as front running, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-08-17 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Front Running , Insider Trading settled
SEC v. Lawrence Billimek and Alan Williams (front running, 2022) SEC 2022-12-20 Front Running unknown
CFTC v. Energy Broker and Its Owner (front running, 2019) CFTC 2019-10-01 Front Running $1.5m judgment
CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-28 Front Running , Insider Trading filed
SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) SEC 2018-07-23 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 settled
SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016) SEC 2016-10-12 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 $100k judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.