SEC v. Wanger and Eric David Wanger Investment Management, Inc. (marking the close, 2017)
Dismissed
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action, since dismissed, against Wanger and Eric David Wanger Investment Management, Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as marking the close. The release records a civil penalty of $75,000.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-14676 |
| Date filed | 2017-07-10 |
| Status | dismissed |
| Asset class | bonds |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | registration bar |
| Defendants | Wanger ; Eric David Wanger Investment Management, Inc. |
| Techniques | Marking the close |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $75k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $75k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 10, 2017 as release 3-14676. The respondents named are Wanger and Eric David Wanger Investment Management, Inc. (1 individual, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as marking the close, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against bonds.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $75,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: registration bar.
The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Marking the close — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Canaccord Genuity LLC (marking the close, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-06 | Marking The Close , Marking The Open +2 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (marking the close, 2021) | SEC | 2021-08-13 | Marking The Close , Matched Orders +1 | $220k | settled |
| SEC v. Andrew J. Kandelapas (marking the close, 2019) | SEC | 2019-06-21 | Marking The Close | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Lai Guanglin (Alan) (marking the close, 2018) | SEC | 2018-12-10 | Marking The Close , Price Manipulation | — | settled |
| SEC v. Richard P. Cedrone, Steven R. Ferris and George R. Thoreson (marking the close, 2017) | SEC | 2017-09-05 | Marking The Close | $75k | judgment |
| SEC v. Adesh Kumar Tyagi (marking the close, 2017) | SEC | 2017-06-01 | Marking The Close | — | unknown |