SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as front running, insider trading and newsletter scalping. The release records a civil penalty of $100,000.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-17622 |
| Date filed | 2016-10-12 |
| Date resolved | 2016-10-12 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | NYSE, Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
| Techniques | Front running , Insider trading , Newsletter scalping |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $100k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $100k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on October 12, 2016 as release 3-17622. The respondents named are Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as front running, insider trading and newsletter scalping, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities, with NYSE, Nasdaq identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $100,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Newsletter scalping — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) | SEC | 2018-07-23 | Front Running , Insider Trading +1 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) | SEC | 2023-03-31 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-28 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Arya Motazedi (front running, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-12-03 | Front Running , Insider Trading | $100k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gary S. Williky (insider trading, 2015) | SEC | 2015-03-02 | Insider Trading , Newsletter Scalping +3 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |