Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as front running, insider trading and newsletter scalping. The release records a civil penalty of $100,000.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-17622
Date filed 2016-10-12
Date resolved 2016-10-12
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Venue NYSE, Nasdaq
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (entity)
Techniques Front running , Insider trading , Newsletter scalping

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$100k
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$100k
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on October 12, 2016 as release 3-17622. The respondents named are Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as front running, insider trading and newsletter scalping, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities, with NYSE, Nasdaq identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $100,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-10-12 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) SEC 2018-07-23 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 settled
SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Front Running , Insider Trading settled
CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-28 Front Running , Insider Trading filed
CFTC v. Arya Motazedi (front running, 2015) CFTC 2015-12-03 Front Running , Insider Trading $100k judgment
SEC v. Gary S. Williky (insider trading, 2015) SEC 2015-03-02 Insider Trading , Newsletter Scalping +3 settled
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.