SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023)
Settled
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running and insider trading. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25683 |
| Date filed | 2023-03-31 |
| Date resolved | 2023-03-31 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Sean Wygovsky ; Christopher Matthaei |
| Techniques | Front running , Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- $3.4m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 31, 2023 as release LR-25683. The respondents named are Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey.
This library tags the matter as front running and insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: officer-and-director bar.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2023-03-31 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-28 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) | SEC | 2018-07-23 | Front Running , Insider Trading +1 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016) | SEC | 2016-10-12 | Front Running , Insider Trading +1 | $100k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Arya Motazedi (front running, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-12-03 | Front Running , Insider Trading | $100k | judgment |
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |