CFTC v. Energy Broker and Its Owner (front running, 2019)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2019, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Energy Broker and Its Owner, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running. The release records a civil penalty of $1.5 million, disgorgement of $413,065.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8030-19 |
| Date filed | 2019-10-01 |
| Date resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | commodities, futures |
| Venue | ICE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Energy Broker ; Its Owner |
| Techniques | Front running |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $1.5m
- Disgorgement
- $413k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $1.9m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on October 1, 2019 as release 8030-19. The respondents named are Energy Broker and Its Owner (2 individuals, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as front running, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against commodities and futures, with ICE identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $1.5 million, disgorgement of $413,065. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2019-10-01 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) | SEC | 2023-03-31 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | settled |
| SEC v. Lawrence Billimek and Alan Williams (front running, 2022) | SEC | 2022-12-20 | Front Running | — | unknown |
| SEC v. Sergei Polevikov, et al. (front running, 2022) | SEC | 2022-08-17 | Front Running | — | dismissed |
| CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-28 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) | SEC | 2018-07-23 | Front Running , Insider Trading +1 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016) | SEC | 2016-10-12 | Front Running , Insider Trading +1 | $100k | judgment |